Bloody Lawyers: The Exclusion Clause at San Juan Hill

"Bloody lawyers. Bully, bully."
Theodore Roosevelt, circa 1895

The Rough Riders charged up Kettle Hill in June 1898 with a kind of moral clarity that the law would soon render invisible. A guest sleeps under your roof. A bully's dog bites. The statute says you are liable, full stop. Strict liability, no exceptions, regardless of what you knew. It sounds like justice. It sounds like the sort of thing Roosevelt would have written himself, that one clear rule should govern without hedge or favour.

But between the statute and the money sits a paragraph in the insurance policy. Fine print. A clause no one reads. The guest is not a resident of the household, you see, so the liability coverage does not apply. The law says you are liable; the policy says you are not covered. The law wins; the victim loses. The lawyer wins. The truth becomes a question of which piece of paper gets read first.

Roosevelt saw it coming. He saw it in the 1890s and it enraged him. Not because the law was weak but because it was useless. A statute that looked strong on its face but crumbled in practice, written over by the quieter voice of contract language. The lie of precision. The triumph of the exclusion clause.

Nick Neck Fadiwak. She's just a guest, the owner said.

Nick Neck Fadiwak. Strict liability fills him with dread.

Nick Neck Fadiwak. The dog will bite (that much is clear),

Nick Neck Fadiwak. But the exclusion clause makes it disappear.

A hundred and thirty years on, and the structure has not changed. The guest arrives. The law is written plain. The insurance company smiles. The paragraph in the policy is longer than the statute. The exclusion more precisely worded than the rule it undermines. The bully wins. Not the dog's owner. The lawyer.

Roosevelt understood that the written word can be a tool or a weapon, depending on who holds it and who reads it last. He knew that a man of action, charged up a hill in the summer sun, is no match for a man in an office with a fountain pen and an exclusion clause. The law says yes; the policy says no. The victim gets the statue. The owner gets the news that his insurance does not apply. And the lawyer, somewhere in New York, files the document away.

That is the real bite. Not the dog's. The clause's.